Bill Banning Predispute Arbitration Clauses in Broker-Dealers’ Customer Agreements Introduced into Congress

Last Friday, Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn) introduced the “Investor Choice Act” into the House of Representatives, a bill that proposes to ban broker-dealers, investment advisers, funding portals and municipal securities dealers from including mandatory arbitration clauses in their customer and client agreements. While Dodd-Frank explicitly authorized the Securities and Exchange Commission to ban such arbitration clauses to protect investors, fhe SEC has not yet acted on its authority and Commisssioner Walter recently stated publicly that the SEC was unlikely to do so in 2013. While I suspect this bill has little to no chance of getting passed, it may prompt the SEC to act in 2014.

3 thoughts on “Bill Banning Predispute Arbitration Clauses in Broker-Dealers’ Customer Agreements Introduced into Congress”

  1. Investors choice is fine, has anyone considered the fact that brokerage firm employees are forced, by the government, to arbitrate their disputes with customers and their employers? Is any other group of employees forced to arbitrate such claims?

  2. This goes in the opposite direction of where we should be going. Legislation authorizing yet more civil litigation (when the system cannot digest what it has now) is poor policy, particularly when the tradition of arbitration in the securities industry has worked so well – in fact, investors probably recover more in arbitration on equity grounds than they would with a strict application of legal principles.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *