February 20, 2012
On Saturday, Feb. 25, the Harvard Negotiation Law Review is sponsoring a symposium entitled “Does ADR Work?
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Alternative Dispute Resolution.” Here is the symposium announcement:
Saturday, February 25th
Check-in at 9:30 AM • Reception to Follow at 5:00 PM
1515 Massachusetts Avenue • Cambridge, MA 02138 • Austin Hall, North Classroom
Keynote Address by Carrie Menkel-Meadow
A.B. Chettle, Jr. Professor of Dispute Resolution and Civil Procedure, Georgetown University Law Center,
and Chancellor’s Professor of Law, University of California, Irvine School of Law
11:30 AM • Lunch to Follow
Co-optation of ADR: Has it Become “Cheap Justice”?
10:00 – 11:30 AM: Is ADR a form of “cheap justice”? This panel will look into the complicated balancing act between fairness, public accountability, and cost, and whether the parties’ interests are appropriate addressed.
Cathy Costantino, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Howard Gadlin, National Institutes of Health
Lawrence Susskind, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Rory Van Loo, Harvard Law School
Nancy Welsh, Dickinson School of Law at Pennsylvania University
ADR in the Criminal Justice System
1:30 – 3:00 PM: ADR features prominently in the criminal justice system in the form of negotiation (plea bargaining) and increasingly through the use of practices and institutions such as restorative circles, victim-offender mediation and problem solving courts. This panel will examine the appropriateness of these methods of ADR, how well they are working, and how they can be optimized to serve society’s interest.
Julian Adler, Red Hook Community Justice Center
Eric Blumenson, Suffolk University Law School
David Breen, Boston University School of Law
Christopher Dearborn, Suffolk University Law School
Michael Sullivan, Ashcroft Group and Former U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts
Quantitative and Qualitative Methods of Evaluating ADR
3:15 – 4:45 PM: In order to determine whether ADR “works,” there must be a way to measure its effectiveness. But can the effectiveness of ADR be evaluated? And are quantitative or qualitative measures the appropriate method of evaluation?
Robert Bordone, Harvard Law School
Dwight Golann, Suffolk University Law School
D. James Greiner, Harvard Law School
Janet Martinez, Stanford Law School
Carrie Menkel-Meadow, Georgetown University Law Center,
University of California, Irvine School of Law
This event is free and open to the public • Optional RSVP at hnlr.org
Sponsored by the Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy Fund, the Program of Negotiation at Harvard Law School, and the Harvard Negotiation and Mediation Clinical Program
Last 5 posts by Jill Gross
- Second Circuit Holds Forum Selection Clause Trumps FINRA Arbitration Requirement - August 21st, 2014
- Hat Trick: NHL Adds Arbitration Clause, Class Action Waiver and One-Year Limitations Period to its Consumer Services Agreement - August 18th, 2014
- FINRA Proposes Bungling "Public" and "Non-Public" Arbitrator Definitions - August 13th, 2014
- Second Circuit Adopts Bright-Line Definition of FINRA "Customer" For Arbitration Purposes - August 1st, 2014
- FINRA Appoints New Arbitration Task Force - July 17th, 2014