May 23, 2009
Yesterday, the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) announced its full support (see press release here) of the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2009, which amends the Federal Arbitration Act to bar enforcement of pre-dispute arbitration clauses in a consumer, employment, franchise and civil rights dispute. NASAA, whose membership consists of the securities administrators in the 50 states and other US districts and territories, is devoted to investor protection and opposes mandatory arbitration in the securities industry.
NASAA also recognizes that, unlike the House version of the bill, the Senate version of the bill explicitly defines “consumer dispute” to include disputes involving securities or investment. Thus, Section 402(2) provides:
the term ‘consumer dispute’ means a dispute between a person other than an organization who seeks or acquires real or personal property, services (including services relating to securities and other investments), money, or credit for personal, family, or household purposes and the seller or provider of such property, services, money, or credit;
NASAA urges the House of Representatives to amend its version of the bill to conform to the Senate bill so that the AFA would explicitly bar enforcement of arbitration clauses in investors’ account agreements. As I wrote last week on this blog, I think securities arbitration is sufficiently different from the consumer arbitration targeted by this bill so as to call for different policy choices.
Last 5 posts by Jill Gross
- Hat Trick: NHL Adds Arbitration Clause, Class Action Waiver and One-Year Limitations Period to its Consumer Services Agreement - August 18th, 2014
- FINRA Proposes Bungling "Public" and "Non-Public" Arbitrator Definitions - August 13th, 2014
- Second Circuit Adopts Bright-Line Definition of FINRA "Customer" For Arbitration Purposes - August 1st, 2014
- FINRA Appoints New Arbitration Task Force - July 17th, 2014
- Securities Arbitration Commentator Launches New Blog - July 9th, 2014