Comments on: Are ADR and Empirical Legal Studies Cousins ? http://www.indisputably.org/?p=738 A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:43:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Nancy Welsh http://www.indisputably.org/?p=738&cpage=1#comment-3898 Nancy Welsh Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:23:29 +0000 http://www.indisputably.org/?p=738#comment-3898 Hi Art: How wonderful to think of procedures--in dispute resolution, decision making and empirical research--as binding various substantive areas together. That trans-substantive vision also inspired the development of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. There, however, the vision is breaking down. What does this portend for those of us involved in dispute resolution and empirical research? And should I infer anything from your spelling of "elicitive" as "illicitive?" With a smile, Nancy Hi Art:

How wonderful to think of procedures–in dispute resolution, decision making and empirical research–as binding various substantive areas together. That trans-substantive vision also inspired the development of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. There, however, the vision is breaking down. What does this portend for those of us involved in dispute resolution and empirical research?

And should I infer anything from your spelling of “elicitive” as “illicitive?”

With a smile,

Nancy

]]> By: Joe http://www.indisputably.org/?p=738&cpage=1#comment-3836 Joe Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:08:47 +0000 http://www.indisputably.org/?p=738#comment-3836 Well, a process can easily be the topic of conversation. With ADR, we need to address how this changes our legal system, because it does. Well, a process can easily be the topic of conversation. With ADR, we need to address how this changes our legal system, because it does.

]]>