<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Women Should Control Wall Street</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indisputably.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indisputably.org/?p=188</link>
	<description>A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:21:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Butler</title>
		<link>http://www.indisputably.org/?p=188&#038;cpage=1#comment-2018</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indisputably.org/?p=188#comment-2018</guid>
		<description>This article while interesting posses another question: Should we recognize or ignore inherent differences in the sexes? Some would argue no, and that we should never treat people as inherently different due to their sex. 

People who would make that argument would argue that any assertion that men are inherently different from women (even if the men are different in negative way) is sexism. And that we should treat all people as equally the same and to suggest otherwise would be sexist. 

I would argue that by recognizing the inherent difference in the sexes we could create a better more diverse society. By recognizing that male and female investors tend to do better in different economies (men when more risk taking is appropriate, women when risk taking is a bad idea) companies can achieve two important goals: First by diversifying who works for them (the male to female ratio) they can create a better portfolio for their clients because the investment portfolios will do better in a wide variety of economic situations, and second, and perhaps more importantly, they can diversify their workplace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article while interesting posses another question: Should we recognize or ignore inherent differences in the sexes? Some would argue no, and that we should never treat people as inherently different due to their sex. </p>
<p>People who would make that argument would argue that any assertion that men are inherently different from women (even if the men are different in negative way) is sexism. And that we should treat all people as equally the same and to suggest otherwise would be sexist. </p>
<p>I would argue that by recognizing the inherent difference in the sexes we could create a better more diverse society. By recognizing that male and female investors tend to do better in different economies (men when more risk taking is appropriate, women when risk taking is a bad idea) companies can achieve two important goals: First by diversifying who works for them (the male to female ratio) they can create a better portfolio for their clients because the investment portfolios will do better in a wide variety of economic situations, and second, and perhaps more importantly, they can diversify their workplace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Women Should Control Wall Street : Marquette University Law School Faculty Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.indisputably.org/?p=188&#038;cpage=1#comment-1999</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Women Should Control Wall Street : Marquette University Law School Faculty Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indisputably.org/?p=188#comment-1999</guid>
		<description>[...] Cross-posted at Indisputably. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cross-posted at Indisputably. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brother Mat</title>
		<link>http://www.indisputably.org/?p=188&#038;cpage=1#comment-1984</link>
		<dc:creator>Brother Mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indisputably.org/?p=188#comment-1984</guid>
		<description>Personally, I have a team of eunuchs managing my portfolio.  But that&#039;s just me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I have a team of eunuchs managing my portfolio.  But that&#8217;s just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feminist Law Professors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why Women Should Control Wall Street</title>
		<link>http://www.indisputably.org/?p=188&#038;cpage=1#comment-1983</link>
		<dc:creator>Feminist Law Professors &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why Women Should Control Wall Street</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indisputably.org/?p=188#comment-1983</guid>
		<description>[...] Cross posted at The ADR Prof Blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cross posted at The ADR Prof Blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
