<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADR Prof Blog &#187; Sarah Cole</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.indisputably.org/?feed=rss2&#038;author=6" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.indisputably.org</link>
	<description>A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:43:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>End of Arbitration in Financial Services Contracts?</title>
		<link>http://www.indisputably.org/?p=1428</link>
		<comments>http://www.indisputably.org/?p=1428#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Cole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indisputably.org/?p=1428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today House and Senate negotiators reached agreement on legislation that redefines federal oversight of the financial services industry.  The agreement may have a major effect on arbitration in the financial services industry.  Overlawyered reports, &#8220;Tucked away in the Obama administration’s proposals for revamping regulation of financial services is a provision that would apparently [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indisputably.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1428</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Victory for Business in Rent-A-Center West v. Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.indisputably.org/?p=1411</link>
		<comments>http://www.indisputably.org/?p=1411#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Cole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indisputably.org/?p=1411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today in Jackson v. Rent-A-Center West, the Court again confirmed its view that challenges to a contract which contains an arbitration agreement will go to the arbitrator, a view that it has held and repeatedly affirmed since its decision in Prima Paint in the mid 1960s.  Under Prima Paint, a party may enforce a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indisputably.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1411</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jackson v. Rent-a-Center West</title>
		<link>http://www.indisputably.org/?p=1293</link>
		<comments>http://www.indisputably.org/?p=1293#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 14:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Cole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indisputably.org/?p=1293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a link to an article (in which yours truly is quoted) covering the case:   http://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20100502/ISSUE01/305029980.  I had a nice chat about Jackson with Professor Stephen Ware at our 20th law school reunion this past weekend.  After that discussion, I am torn about predicting the outcome of this case.  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indisputably.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1293</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oral Argument in Jackson v. Rent-a-Center West</title>
		<link>http://www.indisputably.org/?p=1275</link>
		<comments>http://www.indisputably.org/?p=1275#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Cole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indisputably.org/?p=1275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I mentioned in my previous post, I did plan on blogging about Jackson v. Rent-a-Center West but was side-tracked by the issuance of the Stolt-Nielsen decision.  As many of you know, the question in the Jackson case is whether an agreement between a consumer and a business that sends the question of whether [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indisputably.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1275</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stolt-Nielsen v. Animalfeeds &#8212; Major Victory for Business</title>
		<link>http://www.indisputably.org/?p=1268</link>
		<comments>http://www.indisputably.org/?p=1268#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Cole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indisputably.org/?p=1268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I woke up today planning to blog about the oral argument in the Rent-a-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson case that was argued yesterday in the Supreme Court &#8212; I will get to that, but wanted to write first about a major arbitration decision the Supreme Court handed down today:  Stolt-Nielsen v. Animalfeeds (http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-1198.pdf).  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.indisputably.org/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1268</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
