ADR Prof Blog

In May, the Third Circuit heard oral arguments in Delaware Coalition for Open Government v. Stine, the case challenging the constitutionality of Delaware’s chancery arbitration scheme (see my previous commentary on the program here, here, and here.) A federal court had found the scheme unconstitutional on grounds that it violated the public’s First Amendment right [...]

[Read more →]

CALL FOR PAPERS ADR and the Regulatory State Sponsored by the AALS Section on Alternative Dispute Resolution 2014 AALS Annual Meeting • January 2-5, 2014 • New York City Private dispute resolution and agency decision-making are now prominent and permanent features of our legal landscape, either as substitutes for or alternatives to formal adjudication. In [...]

[Read more →]

I will be moderating a panel discussion at Cardozo School of Law this Thursday evening on the Delaware Chancery Court’s arbitration program, which I blogged about here and here. The Delaware scheme was struck down by a federal district court last year. The case is now on appeal to the Third Circuit. Here are the [...]

[Read more →]

Shortly after the 2011 debt crisis, I wrote a post titled “Neutral in Chief?” in which I suggested that, while President Obama was perceived to have “lost the debt crisis negotiation,” he may not have seen himself in the role of negotiator at all. He may in fact have seen his role closer to that [...]

[Read more →]

In my previous post on Nitro-Lift, I argued that arbitration agreements involving covenants not to compete could be susceptible to challenge under the Federal Arbitration Act’s savings clause. Because it equates arbitrators with courts sitting in other jurisdictions, that analysis rests on an assumption that arbitrators act as quasi-public dispute resolvers, determining rights and obligations [...]

[Read more →]